Implementation of Website-Based Graduate Learning Outcomes Measurement System

Umri Erdiansyah, Guntur Syahputra, Fachri Yanuar Rudi

Sari


Digital transformation in higher education quality assurance has become imperative following the enactment of the Minister of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology Regulation No. 53 of 2023. This study proposes the development of a web-based Graduate Learning Outcomes (GLO) measurement system to accelerate academic evaluation effectiveness at Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe. Employing a Research and Development (R&D) approach with the Waterfall development model, this research designs the system architecture using the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern to ensure application scalability and modularity. The system integrates academic data management features, automated GLO calculations, and analytical data visualization to support data-driven decision-making. System testing involved User Acceptance Testing (UAT), yielding a System Usability Scale (SUS) score of 82.3, indicating an 'excellent' user acceptance level. The results confirm that this platform not only meets national regulatory compliance standards but also enhances transparency and objectivity in graduate quality reporting. This implementation makes a strategic contribution to the modernization of institutional academic governance.


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Kemendikbudristek, Buku panduan merdeka belajar - kampus merdeka. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi., 2020.

L. Suskie, ssessing student learning: A common sense guide (3rd ed.). Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2018.

G. D. Kuh et al., Using evidence of student learning to improve higher education. Hoboken, NJ, US: Jossey-Bass/Wiley, 2015.

B. Stensaker dan L. Harvey, Accountability in higher education: Global perspectives on trust and power. New York: Routledge.

L. W. Anderson dan D. R. Krathwohl, A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, 2001.

R. Pressman dan B. Maxim, Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 9 ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2020.

J. W. Creswell dan J. D. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 5 ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications., 2018.

A. Dennis, B. Wixom, dan D. Tegarden, Systems analysis and design: An object-oriented approach with UML, 5th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons., 2015.

I. Sommerville, Software engineering (10th ed.), 10th ed. Boston: Pearson Education., 2016.

J. Brooke, “SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale,†in Usability Evaluation in Industry", PW Jordan, B Thomas, I McLelland, BA Weerdmeester (eds), Londod: Taylor and Francis, 1996.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30811/jaise.v5i4.8584

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Indexing :

Creative Commons License
Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Software Engineering (JAISE) licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.