Kebijakan Editorial

Fokus dan Ruang Lingkup

Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Software Engineering (J-AISE) publishes the scientific articles in area :

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Natural Language Processing
  • Computer Vision
  • Robotics and Navigation Systems
  • Decision Support System
  • Implementation of Algorithms
  • Expert System
  • Data Mining
  • Enterprise Architecture Design & Management
  • Software & Networking Engineering
  • IoT

 

Kebijakan Bagian

Artikel

Centang Naskah Terbuka Centang Diindeks Centang Telah di-Peer review
 

Kebijakan Akses Terbuka

Our journal is fully committed to the principles of open access in scholarly research. We believe that knowledge should be available freely and openly to everyone, without financial barriers or access restrictions. With that in mind, we make the following commitments regarding open access:

  1. Free Access: All content in our journal is freely accessible to individuals, researchers, and interested parties without subscription fees or access restrictions.

  2. Open Licensing: We employ open licenses that allow readers to download, print, and redistribute the content with full freedom, provided proper attribution is given.

  3. Support for Open Access Standards: We endorse standards and initiatives for open access that aim to ensure that research is accessible and usable by as many people as possible.

Our commitment to open access reflects our strong values of knowledge dissemination and scientific collaboration. We firmly believe that research and science should be a shared heritage available to the entire global community."

 

Pengarsipan

Our journal is committed to preserving the integrity and accessibility of the scholarly content we publish. To achieve this, we have implemented a LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe) archival system.

LOCKSS is an international, community-governed digital preservation system that ensures long-term access to scholarly literature. It works by creating distributed, redundant copies of our journal's content across multiple nodes, ensuring that if any individual copy is lost or corrupted, others remain available for retrieval.

Here are some key points related to our LOCKSS archive policy:

  1. Content Preservation: Our journal's content is regularly deposited into the LOCKSS network, where it is stored securely and redundantly to prevent data loss.

  2. Distributed Network: LOCKSS operates through a network of participating institutions and libraries, ensuring content is widely distributed.

  3. Data Integrity: LOCKSS continuously monitors and repairs any corrupted or lost data to maintain the integrity of the archive.

  4. Persistent Access: LOCKSS guarantees that even in the face of hardware failures, network issues, or other challenges, readers will have persistent access to our content.

We are dedicated to providing a reliable and lasting repository for our published articles, and LOCKSS plays a crucial role in achieving this objective. It aligns with our commitment to the long-term preservation and accessibility of scholarly knowledge."

This statement highlights the use of LOCKSS for preserving and ensuring the accessibility of the journal's content over the long term.

 

Publication Ethics

This statement on the code of ethics for scientific publications refers to the Regulation of the Head of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications, which essentially upholds three ethical values in publications, namely:

  1. Neutrality, namely free from conflict of interest in managing publications;
  2. Justice, namely giving authorship rights to those entitled to be authors/writers; And
  3. Honesty, namely free from Duplication, Fabrication, Falsification and Plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.

The ethical publication code guidelines are adopted from Elsevier's publication ethics policy:

FOR EDITOR:

  1. Publication Decision.  The Editor is directed by the editorial board's policies and is subject to legal provisions that must be enforced, such as defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism, in carrying out their tasks. When making this judgment, the editor may consult with reviewers or other editors.
  2. Objective Assessment. The editor assesses a submission based on its intellectual substance without regard for religion, ethnicity, tribe, gender, nation, or other factors.
  3. Conflict of Interest. The editor must decline to evaluate a manuscript if the editor has a conflict of interest caused by a competing, collaborative, or other relationship with the author, company, or institution relating to the manuscript. Other than the writer, reviewer, and prospective reviewer, the editorial team will not reveal any information about the received manuscript.

FOR REVIEWER:

  1. Contribution to Editorial Decision. Blind peer review oleh reviewer membantu editor dalam mengambil keputusan serta dapat membantu penulis dalam memperbaiki tulisannya melalui komunikasi editorial antara reviewer dengan penulis. Peer review merupakan suatu komponen penting dalam komunikasi keilmuan formal (formal scholarly communication) dan pendekatan ilmiah.
  2. Punctuality. reviewers must carry out reviewer activities according to the specified schedule. If you feel you cannot complete it within the time given, then immediately notify the editor in chief.
  3. Confidentiality. Any manuscript that has been accepted for review must be treated as a confidential document. Unless allowed by the editor, the manuscript may not be shown or discussed with anyone else.
  4. Conflict of Interest. Unpublished papers may not be used in the reviewer's personal research without the author's express permission. Peer review information or suggestions must be kept confidential and must not be used for personal advantage. Reviewers should decline to read a manuscript if they have a competing, collaborative, or other relationship with the authors, firms, or organizations involved in the work.

FOR AUTHOR:

  1. Writing Standards. The research data must be accurately provided in the article. An article must be informative enough and include enough references for others to repeat the effort. Paper fraud or false presentation is unethical and improper behavior.
  2. Access Research Data. For papers to be evaluated, authors may be required to submit raw data; if this is the case, they must be able to make the data accessible to the public and preserve it for a fair amount of time after publication.
  3. Originality and Plagiarism. Every work submitted for publication should be original. It should present new ideas, findings, or creative expressions that haven't been published or presented elsewhere. Authors must clearly attribute sources when using others' work, ideas, or expressions in their own work. Multiple publications of substantially similar work in different venues should be avoided, as this can constitute self-plagiarism. Self-Plagiarism: Authors should avoid reusing their own work without proper citation and disclosure. This is especially important in academic writing and publishing.
  4. Authorship: A person who has significantly influenced the idea, planning, execution, or interpretation of the writing in the article is referred to as the author. Co-authors are those who have contributed significantly and are listed. The corresponding author is responsible for making sure that all coauthors are credited in the article, that they have all reviewed and approved the completed version of the work, and that they have all given their approval for the paper to be submitted for publication
  5. Article Submission Terms. The identical work cannot be published in more than one journal by the same author. It is unethical and improper for scientists to submit the same work to multiple journals for publication.
  6. Proper Attribution: When using the work of others, proper attribution is crucial. This includes citing sources, providing references, and acknowledging the intellectual contributions of others. Failure to give credit to the original sources of information or ideas is considered plagiarism.
  7. Human Subjects.  The author must make sure that the manuscript states that all procedures were carried out in compliance with applicable laws and regulations and that the relevant institution and committee within the institution have authorized them if the work involves human beings. A declaration indicating consent has been acquired for research involving human participants must be included by the authors in their article. Human subjects' right to privacy must constantly be taken into account. If authors want to incorporate case details or other personal information in the work, they must get consent, approval, and acknowledgment. The author shall keep a copy of the written consent or evidence that consent has been received, and the journal shall have access to it upon request.

FOR WEBSITE ADMINISTRATOR:

Website Administrator: This person is in charge of running the online journal. In particular, a website administrator's range of responsibilities includes the following:

  1. Set up the system preferences and user accounts;
  2. Register authors, editors, and reviewers;
Control journal attributes; Examine report data; and post or publish documents that have been approved.

 

Peer Review Process

The peer review process for journal submission typically involves several steps. While the exact process may vary from one journal to another, here are the general steps involved:

 

  1. Submission: The author submits their manuscript to the journal, often through an online submission system. The manuscript includes the research paper, any supplementary materials, and a cover letter explaining the significance of the research.
  2. Editorial Review: Upon submission, the journal's editorial team conducts an initial review to assess whether the manuscript aligns with the journal's scope and guidelines. If it doesn't meet the basic requirements, it may be desk-rejected.
  3. Appraisal by Editor-in-chief : The role of an Editor-in-Chief (EIC) is a crucial and leadership position in the world of publishing, especially in academic journals and magazines. The EIC is responsible for overseeing the entire editorial process, maintaining the journal's quality and integrity, and providing strategic direction. Here are the primary tasks and responsibilities of an Editor-in-Chief:
  • Content Selection: The EIC plays a key role in selecting content for publication. They decide which articles, papers, or manuscripts are suitable for the journal.
  • Peer Review Management: The EIC is responsible for the peer review process, ensuring that manuscripts undergo rigorous and impartial review by experts in the field.
  • Editorial Board: They often assemble and manage an editorial board or team of associate editors and reviewers to assist in the review process.
  1. Peer Review Assignment: If the manuscript passes the initial review, the editor selects peer reviewers. These reviewers are experts in the field and are typically researchers or academics. The number of reviewers can vary, but there are usually two or more.
  2. Peer Review: The selected peer reviewers read and evaluate the manuscript. They assess the quality of the research, methodology, analysis, and conclusions. Reviewers provide feedback, comments, and recommendations for revisions. This process is often "double-blind," meaning that both the authors and the reviewers are typically anonymous to each other.
  3. Author Revisions: Based on the feedback from the reviewers, the authors revise their manuscript. They address the reviewers' comments and make any necessary improvements.
  4. Reviewer's Second Evaluation: After the authors submit their revisions, the reviewers re-evaluate the manuscript to ensure that their concerns have been addressed adequately. They may recommend further revisions if needed.
  5. Editor's Decision: The editor reviews the manuscript, the reviewers' comments, and the authors' responses. Based on this, the editor makes a decision about the manuscript. The possible decisions include:
  • Accept: The manuscript is accepted for publication.
  • Minor Revisions: The manuscript requires minor changes before acceptance.
  • Major Revisions: The manuscript requires significant revisions and another round of review.
  • Reject: The manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal.

 

  1. Revisions and Resubmission: If revisions are required, the authors make the necessary changes and resubmit the manuscript. The process may go through several rounds of revision and review.
  2. Acceptance: Once the editor is satisfied with the manuscript's quality, it is accepted for publication.
  3. Proofreading and Production: The accepted manuscript goes through proofreading and formatting to meet the journal's standards. The authors may be involved in this process, checking proofs for accuracy.
  4. Publication: The manuscript is published in the journal, often both in print and online. It is assigned a publication date and becomes part of the journal's archive.

It's important to note that the peer review process can take several months or even longer, depending on the complexity of the revisions and the speed of communication between authors, reviewers, and the editorial team. Additionally, some journals may use variations of this process, such as open peer review or single-blind review, which may involve different levels of transparency and author-reviewer interaction.

 

Copyright and License

The copyright for any article in the Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Software Engineering (J-AISE) is fully held by the author under a Creative Commons CC BY-SA 4.0 license.

You are free to:

  • Share : copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  • Adapt : remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  • Attribution : You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • ShareAlike - If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

 


 

Authors's Fee

Starting from volume 4 no 2, 2024, the Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Software Engineering (JAISE) charges a published paper as is shown below:

  1. The cost paid by Author with Indonesia citizenship is Rp 300.000 (IDR)
  2. The cost paid by Author with non-Indonesia citizenship is USD 0 (Free of charge)

This cost covers:

  • The standard six (6) pages manuscript.
  • Similarity Checking by Turnitin. The final result will be sent to the authors.
  • DOI registration for each paper.
  • Grammar Check including correctness, clarity, coherence, cohesion, engagement, delivery
  • This cost also includes submitting, peer-reviewing, editing, publishing, maintaining and archiving, and allows immediate access to the full-text versions of the articles.