Determining VAK Learning Styles Using SAW and TOPSIS Methods

Asep Doni Pradana, Wahyudin Wahyudin, Budi Laksono Putro

Sari


This study aims to identify the dominant learning styles of 10th grade PPLG SMKN 1 Talaga students and analyze the application of the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) in supporting adaptive learning. Data were collected through the VAK (Visual, Auditory, Kinesthetic) learning style questionnaire, structured observation, and student learning outcomes. The SAW method was used to calculate the preference weights from the three data sources with the same weight (0.33). Vague or combined learning styles were further analyzed using the TOPSIS method for data normalization and grouping. The results showed that the kinesthetic learning style was dominant based on the questionnaire (56.25%) and learning outcomes (40.63%). However, observations showed that the visual learning style was more prominent (32.81%), revealing differences between measurement methods. These findings emphasize the importance of direct practice-based learning, especially for kinesthetic students. Learning media such as videos, direct practice, and visual-based modules are recommended to support learning effectiveness. This study proves that the integration of SAW and TOPSIS produces a comprehensive learning style evaluation, providing guidance for teachers in designing more adaptive learning strategies. Further research on a larger scale is needed for further validation.

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


BSNP, “ParadigmaPendidikan Nasional Abad XXI,†[Online], Tersedia: http://www.bsnp-indonesia.org/id/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/LaporanBSNP-2010.pdf diakses pada tanggal 23 Januari 2023, 2010.

S. &. A. E. A. Ulvah, “Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa ditinjau melalui Model Pembelajaran SAVI dan Konvensional,†Jurnal Riset Pendidikan, pp. 2(2), 142-153, 2016.

N. S. &. R. V. G. Raj, “Architecture of an Adaptive Personalized Learning Environment (APLE) for content recommendation,†em ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2018.

A. P. J. I. I. APJII, “Profil Pengguna Internet Indonesia,†APJII, Jakarta, 2014.

P. C. R. J. T. G. F. Y. Y. C. a. D. Y. Sun, “What Drives a Successful E-Learning? An Empirical Investigation of the Critical Factors Influencing Learner Satisfaction,†Computer and Education, p. 50 (4):1183–1202, 2007.

Sfenrianto, “ Klasifikasi Gaya Belajar Verbal dan Visual dari Peserta Didik untuk Sistem e-learning Adaptif,†Konferensi Nasional Informatika (KNIF 2010), 2010.

L. S. N. M. R. H. W. A. P. Riza, “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Event Logging Systems untuk Analisis Perilaku Belajar Siswa,†Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Jilid 22, Nomor 2, pp. 117-124, 2016.

M. M. N. &. W. R. M. Kamran, “A Comparative Exploration of the Effect of Differentiated Teaching Method vs. Traditional Teaching Method on Students’ Learning at ‘A’ level.,†Global Social Sciences Review, IV(I), pp. 61–66. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(iv-i).08, 2019.

V. &. C. A. Chislett, “VAK Learning Styles Self-Assessment Questionnaire,†2005. [Online].

B. Prashnig, The Power of Diversity: New Ways of Learning and Teaching through Learning Styles, Stafford: Network Educational Press, 2006.

S. A. R. &. Y. M. Syawalina, “Pengaruh Gaya Belajar VAK (Visual, Auditorial dan Kinestetik) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Pada Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Indonesia Siswa Kelas XI IPA 2 SMA Negeri 7 Kota Serang,†J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah, vol. 4(1), nº https://doi.org/10.56799/jceki.v4i1.6252, p. 342–352, 2024.

I. I. I. W. H. &. K. F. Suci, ransformasi Digital dan Gaya Belajar, Jawa Tengah: CV Pena Persada, 2020.

S. P. H. H. S. &. W. R. P. Kusumadewi, Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM), Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2006.

A. Rahman, “Penerapan Metode SAW untuk Menilai Kinerja Akademik dan Non-Akademik,†Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Teknologi, pp. 14(2), 85–92, 2017.

C. L. &. Y. K. Hwang, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1981.

K. P. &. K. K. S. Yoon, TOPSIS for Multi-Criteria Decision Making, New York: Springer, 2010.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30811/jaise.v5i1.6293

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Indexing :

Creative Commons License
Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Software Engineering (JAISE) licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.