Thermal distribution and macrostructural characteristics of TIG-welded Cu/SS316L dissimilar joints: experimental and numerical study

Azwinur Azwinur; Agus Suprihanto; Mukhsinun Hadi Kusuma; Khoiri Rozi; Usman Usman; Surya Dharma; Hamdani Hamdani

doi:10.30811/jpl.v24i2.7838

Thermal distribution and macrostructural characteristics of TIG-welded Cu/SS316L dissimilar joints: experimental and numerical study

Azwinur Azwinur, Agus Suprihanto, Mukhsinun Hadi Kusuma, Khoiri Rozi, Usman Usman, Surya Dharma, Hamdani Hamdani

Abstract

Dissimilar welding of copper (Cu) and Stainless Steel 316L (SS316L) presents significant challenges due to their large differences in thermal conductivity and melting temperature, which lead to asymmetric heat distribution and non-uniform penetration. This study aims to evaluate the effect of welding current on temperature distribution and macrostructural characteristics of TIG-welded Cu/SS316L joints using ERCuSi-A filler through an integrated experimental and numerical approach. Welding experiments were conducted at three current levels: 120 A, 135 A, and 150 A on 2.7 mm thick plates. Macrostructural examinations were performed to assess weld bead geometry and penetration behavior. Transient thermal simulations were carried out using ANSYS Workbench to predict temperature fields and thermal gradients. The results indicate that welding current significantly influences weld morphology and thermal behavior. At 120 A, the weld bead was relatively narrow with limited penetration on the Cu side due to rapid heat dissipation. At 135 A, a more uniform fusion profile was achieved, with simulated peak temperatures exceeding 1000°C and an improved penetration balance between Cu and SS316L. At 150 A, deeper penetration into SS316L was observed; however, the heating cycle became shorter and the temperature distribution more localized. Numerical results consistently showed asymmetric temperature fields, where heat diffused rapidly into Cu and concentrated in SS316L. The strong correlation between simulation and macrostructural observations confirms that thermal distribution governs weld geometry and penetration behavior. The 135 A current provides the most balanced fusion characteristics, making it suitable for Cu/SS316L dissimilar joints in heat-transfer applications.

Keywords

Cu/SS316L; TIG welding; ANSYS simulation; temperature distribution; macrostructural analysis; dissimilar metal welding

Full Text:

PDF

References

J. Andersson, “Welding metallurgy and weldability of superalloys,” Metals, vol. 10, no. 1. MDPI, p. 143, 2020.

K. Kumar, C. S. Kumar, M. Masanta, and S. Pradhan, “A review on TIG welding technology variants and its effect on weld geometry,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 50, pp. 999–1004, 2022.

L. I. Markashova, V. D. Poznyakov, E. N. Berdnikova, A. A. Gajvoronsky, and T. A. Alekseenko, “Effect of structural factors on mechanical properties and crack resistance of welded joints of metals, alloys and composite materials,” Pat. Weld. J, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 22–28, 2014.

N. Yadaiah and S. Bag, “Effect of heat source parameters in thermal and mechanical analysis of linear GTA welding process,” ISIJ Int., vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 2069–2075, 2012.

S. Singh, “Analysis of various defects involved in welding metallurgy,” Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 120, no. 6, pp. 6267–6280, 2018.

K. Antony and T. R. Rakeshnath, “Dissimilar laser welding of commercially pure copper and stainless steel 316L,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 26, pp. 369–372, 2020.

M. Li and S. J. Zinkle, “Physical and mechanical properties of copper and copper alloys,” 2012.

M. H. Kusuma, U. Setiorini, T. A. R. Putri, G. A. R. Antariksawan, and M. Juarsa, “Effective thermal conductivity of U-shaped heat pipe,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 550, no. 1, p. 012004, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/550/1/012004.

T. Pasang et al., “Microstructure and mechanical properties of welded additively manufactured stainless steels SS316L,” Met. Mater. Int., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1278–1286, 2019.

B. Tomar and S. Shiva, “Microstructural and mechanical properties examination of SS316L-Cu functionally graded material fabricated by wire arc additive manufacturing,” CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol., vol. 50, pp. 26–39, 2024.

Y. Singla, “Mechanical Properties Study of Copper/Stainless Steel Dissimilar Weld Joints,” Mod. Approaches Mater. Sci., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 271–273, 2020, doi: 10.32474/mams.2020.02.000144.

Y. Poo-arporn et al., “Gas tungsten arc welding of copper to stainless steel for ultra-high vacuum applications,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 277, p. 116490, 2020.

A. R. Pavan, N. Chandrasekar, B. Arivazhagan, S. Kumar, and M. Vasudevan, “Study of arc characteristics using varying shielding gas and optimization of activated-tig welding technique for thick AISI 316L (N) plates,” CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol., vol. 35, pp. 675–690, 2021.

J. Singh, L. Thakur, and S. Angra, “Effect of argon flow rate and standoff distance on the microstructure and wear behaviour of WC-CoCr TIG cladding,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2019, p. 12162.

S. C. Moi, P. K. Pal, A. Bandyopadhyay, and R. Rudrapati, “Effect of Heat Input on the Mechanical and Metallurgical Characteristics of TIG Welded Joints.,” J. Mech. Eng., vol. 16, no. 2, 2019.

Y. Xu et al., “Correlation between the microstructure and corrosion behaviour of copper/316 L stainless-steel dissimilar-metal welded joints,” Corros. Sci., vol. 191, p. 109729, 2021.

Y. Meng, X. Li, M. Gao, and X. Zeng, “Microstructures and mechanical properties of laser-arc hybrid welded dissimilar pure copper to stainless steel,” Opt. Laser Technol., vol. 111, pp. 140–145, 2019.

Q. Nguyen, A. Azadkhou, M. Akbari, A. Panjehpour, and A. Karimipour, “Experimental investigation of temperature field and fusion zone microstructure in dissimilar pulsed laser welding of austenitic stainless steel and copper,” J. Manuf. Process., vol. 56, pp. 206–215, 2020.

E. Zumelzu and C. Cabezas, “Study on welding such dissimilar materials as AISI 304 stainless steel and DHP copper in a sea-water environment. Influence of weld metals on corrosion,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 57, no. 3–4, pp. 249–252, 1996.

P. Anbarasu, R. Yokeswaran, A. G. Antony, and S. Sivachandran, “Investigation of filler material influence on hardness of TIG welded joints,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 21, pp. 964–967, 2020.

N. Jeyaprakash, A. Haile, and M. Arunprasath, “The parameters and equipments used in TIG welding: A review,” Int. J. Eng. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 11–20, 2015.

E. S. V Marques, F. J. G. Silva, and A. B. Pereira, “Comparison of finite element methods in fusion welding processes—A review,” Metals (Basel)., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 75, 2020.

C. E. Etin-osa and J. I. Achebo, “Analysis of optimum butt welded joint for mild steel components using FEM (ANSYS),” Am. J. Nav. Archit. Mar. Eng., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 61–70, 2017.

H. Arora, K. M. Basha, D. N. Abhishek, and B. Devesh, “Welding simulation of circumferential weld joint using TIG welding process,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 50, pp. 923–929, 2022.

I. A. Bataev, “Structure of explosively welded materials: experimental study and numerical simulation,” Met. Work. Mater. Sci, vol. 77, pp. 55–67, 2017.

A. Azwinur, M. H. Kusuma, U. Usman, and S. Dharma, “Effects of Heat Input on Mechanical Properties, Microstructures and Thermal Conductivity of Copper Alloy in Gas Tungsten Arc Welding Technology,” Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J., vol. 16, no. 6, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://www.astrj.com/Effects-of-Heat-Input-on-Mechanical-Properties-Microstructures-and-Thermal-Conductivity,203367,0,1.html

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30811/jpl.v24i2.7838