Experimental study of geometric error of CNC turning machine tools based on ISO 13041-6

Herman Budi Harja, Elan Suherlan, Nandang Rusmana, Dhion Khairul Nugraha

Abstract


The product quality of machining results is greatly influenced by the accuracy and precision of CNC lathe machine tools. Regular inspection of the geometric inaccuracy of the machine tool is necessary to verify its operational viability. This research contribution focuses on conducting experimental studies to evaluate machine tool geometric error. The aim is to explore cost-effective measurement methods as alternatives to direct measurements, which often involve laser interferometers and ball bar tests. The objective of this study is to investigate the geometric inaccuracy of a CNC turning machine by conducting experimental cutting tests in accordance with ISO 13041-6:2009. The testing will utilize conventional workpiece forms and requirements, including circularity features, flatness, circular features, and maybe combination features. Several geometric errors that can be acquired with this method include circularity errors, linear positional errors, and squareness errors. The cutting test for each workpiece feature of the given shape and specification requires the use of 5 specimens. Consequently, the mean value of the geometric error may be computed. The geometric error value is derived by the analysis of measurement data collected from a Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM) applied to a specimen of the machined workpiece. Moreover, the evaluation of the geometric error condition of machine tools is ascertained through the comparison of the average data for each category of geometric error against the permissible standard values given in ISO 10791-2, ISO 10791-4, and ISO 13041-4. The findings of the study indicate that the implementation of the object machine study is not viable for the production of machined workpieces of satisfactory quality. This is primarily due to the presence of geometric errors in CNC turning that exceed the acceptable tolerance levels. Specifically, these errors manifest as linear positional deviations along multiple coordinates along the X-axis and Z-axis, as well as squareness deviations between the X-axis and Z-axis. The maximum value of the linear positional error along the X-axis is 55.2 μm, while the maximum value of the linear positional error along the Z-axis is 25.6 μm. Additionally, the greatest observed squareness error is 37.3 μm. The X and Z machine axes exhibit deviations beyond acceptable limits in terms of unidirectional accuracy and unidirectional repeatability, as per the established norm


Keywords


Turning CNC machine tools, geometric error, experimental study, ISO 13401-6.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Z. Jiang, Precision Machines, 1st ed. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020.

W. Tian, W. Gao, D. Zhang, and T. Huang, “A general approach for error modeling of machine tools,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., vol. 79, pp. 17–23, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.01.003.

G. W. Vogl, M. Calamari, S. Ye, and M. A. Donmez, “A Sensor-based Method for Diagnostics of Geometric Performance of Machine Tool Linear Axes,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 5, pp. 621–633, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2016.08.051.

A. C. Okafor and Y. M. Ertekin, “Vertical machining center accuracy characterization using laser interferometer Part 1. Linear positional errors,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 394–406, 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00661-0.

H. B. Harja, F. Mohammad, and A. Fathan, “Evaluasi Kinerja Efisiensi Energi Mesin Bubut Melalui Penilaian Indikasi Specific Energy Consumption,” J. Tek. Energi Elektr. Tek. Telekomun. Tek. Elektron., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 389–403, 2021, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.26760/elkomika.v9i2.389 |.

S. Ekinovic, E. Begovi, and E. Hekic, “Ballbar QC10 Measuring Device – Fast Experimental Check of Machine Tools Accuracy,” J. Trends Dev. Mach. Assoc. Technol., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 29–32, 2015.

M. Holub, F. Bradac, Z. Pokorny, and A. Jelinek, “Application of a ballbar fordiagnostics of CNC machine tools,” MM Sci. J., no. December, pp. 2601–2605, 2018, doi: 10.17973/MMSJ.2018_12_2018032.

J. X. Chen, S. W. Lin, X. L. Zhou, and T. Q. Gu, “A ballbar test for measurement and identification the comprehensive error of tilt table,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., vol. 103, pp. 1–12, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2015.12.002.

W. Monika and M. Paweł, “Reproducibility of machine tools’ circularity test according to ISO 230-4 with respect to testing position,” Arch. Mech. Technol. Mater., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 22–26, 2017, doi: 10.1515/amtm-2017-0003.

A. Winarno, S. Lasiyah, B. Tulung Prayoga, I. Aris Hendaryanto, and F. X. Sukidjo, “Development of Accuracy Evaluation Method for Open Loop Educational CNC Milling Machine,” J. Rekayasa Mesin, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 217–225, 2021, doi: 10.21776/ub.jrm.2021.012.01.23.

H. B. Harja and A. Candra, “Assessment of Positional Error CNC Machine Tools using Laser Interferometer,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Applied Science and Technology on Engineering Science (iCAST-ES 2021), 2023, pp. 1352–1358, doi: 10.5220/0010965300003260.

H. B. Harja, A. Nurbaniah, N. S. B. Muhadi, and A. Noviandi, “Straightness Geometric Error Assessment for CNC Milling Machine,” Key Eng. Mater., vol. 939, pp. 39–46, 2023, doi: 10.4028/p-a8n75m.

E. Kurniawan, Syaifurrahman, and B. Jekky, “Pengujian Tingkat Akurasi dan Error Dimensi Hasil Produk Mesin CNC Lathe Mini Custom,” J. Rekayasa Mesin, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 747–756, 2021, doi: 10.7202/1082036ar.

I. O. for Standardiz, ISO 13041-6 : Test conditions for numerically controlled turning machines and turning centres – Part 6 : Accuracy of a finished test piece. Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization., 2009.

R. J. Hocken and P. H. Pereira, Coordinat Measuring Machines and Systems (Manufacturing Engineering and Materials Processing), 2nd ed. CRC Press LLC, 2017.

M. Groover, Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing, 5th ed. New Jersey: New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2016.

International Organization for Standardization, ISO 230-2 Test code for machine tools- Part 2: Determination of accuracy and repeatability of positioning numerically controlled axes, Third. Switzerland, 2006.

International Organization for Standardization, ISO 10791-2 : Test Coditions for Machining Centres - Part 2 : Geometric Tests for Machines with Vertical Spindle or Universal Heads with Vertical Rotary Axis (Vertical Z-Axis). Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 2001.

International Organization for Standardization, ISO 10791-4: Test Conditions for Machining Centres-Accuracy and Repeatability of Positioning of Linear and Rotary Axes. Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 1998.

ISO 13041-4 : Test conditions for numerically controlled turning machines and turning centres – Part 4 : Accuracy and repeatability of positioning of linear and rotary axes. Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 2004.

R. Ramesh, M. A. Mannan, and A. N. Poo, “Error compensation in machine tools- a review. Part II: Thermal errors,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 1257–1284, 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0890-6955(00)00010-9.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30811/jpl.v21i4.3982

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

  

    

    

Lisensi Creative Commons

Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.

 

Mailing Address:

Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe

Jl. Banda Aceh-Medan
Km. 280,3, Buketrata, Mesjid Punteut, Blang Mangat,
Kota Lhokseumawe, 24301

Propinsi Aceh,
Indonesia