Evaluation of Tubing Diameter and Bean Size for Optimization of Well Production Rate

Arya Dwi Candra, Muhammad Firmansyah Hafidzullah, Rakha Reswara, Paradongan Siahaan, Dies Elita Budiyanti, Zainal Abidin

Abstract


Gas field development is a costly affair, thus it is essential that each component of the production system operates properly. The objective of field optimization is to discover the parameter range that maximizes productivity. In addition, the development of natural gas reserves for both fuel and petrochemical purposes is accelerating. Well X is an approximately 4-year-old natural-flow gas well with a gas flowrate of 7.7 MMSCF/D, condensate flowrate of 55 BCPD, and water flowrate of 2 BWPD. As fluid is generated from the reservoir to the surface, the production rate of the well decreases. This well's productivity was evaluated using nodal analysis in conjunction with a comparison of tubing size and bean size. aiming to satisfy gas demand without exceeding the critical limit. The nodal analysis approach is utilized to determine the well's optimal and efficient performance. Moreover, utilizing system analysis, which is a graphical plot between the tubing size and the resulting flow rate, as depicted in Figure 6, we can determine which tubing size delivers the highest or most efficient rate at a particular moment under constant wellhead pressure (node at the wellhead). If the demand grows by 14.4 MMSCF/D, the installed tube size can be changed to 40/64" for optimization purposes. This procedure is more cost-effective because it does not squander money and does not halt gas production at the well. To satisfy the increased gas demand of 14.4 MMSCF/D, the production operator can rotate the bean or choke from its initial 24/64" size to 40/64" size.

Keywords


Optimum Tubing Size; Choke; Production Rate; Gas Field

Full Text:

PDF

References


B. Guo, W. C. Lyons, and A. Ghalambor, Petroleum production engineering: a computer-assisted approach. Burlington, MA: Gulf Professional Pub., 2007. Accessed: Aug. 31, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0713/2007011848.html

H. N. Dmour, “Optimization of Well Production System by NODAL Analysis Technique,” Pet. Sci. Technol., vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1109–1122, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1080/10916466.2010.540609.

E. A. A. Nyok and A. M. E. Mostafa, “Production Optimization for Oil Wells Producing High Water Cut Using Nodal Analysis,” in Proceedings of the International Field Exploration and Development Conference 2019, Singapore, 2020, pp. 3606–3619. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-2485-1_329.

W. E. Gilbert, “Flowing and Gas-lift well Performance,” Drill. Prod. Pract., 1954.

K. E. Brown and J. F. Lea, “Nodal Systems Analysis of Oil and Gas Wells,” J. Pet. Technol., vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1751–1763, Oct. 1985, doi: 10.2118/14714-PA.

J. P. Brill, “Multiphase Flow in Wells,” J. Pet. Technol., vol. 39, no. 01, pp. 15–21, Jan. 1987, doi: 10.2118/16242-PA.

E. Camargo, J. Aguilar, A. Ríos, F. Rivas, and J. Aguilar-Martin, “Nodal analysis-based design for improving gas lift wells production,” WSEAS Trans. Inf. Sci. Appl., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 706–715, May 2008.

J. Mach, E. Proano, and K. E. Brown, “A Nodal Approach For Applying Systems Analysis To The Flowing And Artificial Lift Oil Or Gas Well,” 1979.

A. B. Bitsindou and M. G. Kelkar, “Gas Well Production Optimization Using Dynamic Nodal Analysis,” presented at the SPE Mid-Continent Operations Symposium, Mar. 1999. doi: 10.2118/52170-MS.

T. Ahmed, Reservoir Engineering Handbook, Second Edition, 2nd edition. Woburn, MA: Gulf Professional Publishing, 2002.

R. Wan, Advanced well completion engineering, third edition, 3rd ed. Waltham, Mass.: Gulf Professional Pub., 2011. Accessed: Aug. 31, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://www.books24x7.com/marc.asp?bookid=41837

V. D. Kosmidis, J. D. Perkins, and E. N. Pistikopoulos, “Optimization of Well Oil Rate Allocations in Petroleum Fields,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 43, no. 14, pp. 3513–3527, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.1021/ie034171z.

M. Al Lawati, “Gas Lift Nodal Analysis Model – Economical Optimization Approach,” presented at the SPE Artificial Lift Conference & Exhibition-North America, Oct. 2014. doi: 10.2118/171345-MS.

Y. Fan and C. Sarica, “A Novel Approach for System Instability Prediction Using Nodal Analysis,” presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Sep. 2019. doi: 10.2118/196134-MS.

H. D. Beggs, “Production optimization using NODAL analysis,” Jan. 1991, Accessed: Aug. 31, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/5152528

O. O. Akineste and T. O. Olujinmi, “Dimensionless Inflow Performance Relationship IPR for Gas Wells Using the Back Pressure Equation,” presented at the SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Aug. 2016. doi: 10.2118/184370-MS.

U. G. Ebuka, E. Egelle, and B. Ogbunude, “Integrated Production Systems Optimization: A matu,” Int. J. Sci. Res. IJSR, [Online]. Available: https://www.ijsr.net/

A. Dawud, A. Buhari, and T. Ariadji, “A NEW GUIDELINE FOR GAS WELL PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION USING WELL TESTING DATA,” presented at the Thirty-First Annual Convention and Exhibition, IPA 2007, Jakarta, May 2007.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30811/jpl.v21i1.3196

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

  

    

    

Lisensi Creative Commons

Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.

 

Mailing Address:

Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe

Jl. Banda Aceh-Medan
Km. 280,3, Buketrata, Mesjid Punteut, Blang Mangat,
Kota Lhokseumawe, 24301

Propinsi Aceh,
Indonesia