PENGARUH FAMILY FIRM TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY : COPORATE GOVERNANCE SEBAGAI MODERASI
Sari
The purpose of this study is to empirically examine the influence of family firms on environmental strength and environmental concern in implementing corporate social responsibility (CSR). This study will also examine how the family firm interacts with family members as the board of directors and the interaction between family firms and independent commissioners on environmental strength and environmental concerns in implementing CSR, by including firm size and firm age as control variables. Â This research is a quantitative research. The data is obtained from the annual reports of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2019. The sample was obtained using purposive sampling technique, the total sample was 154 company years. CSR implementation is measured using indicators of environmental strength and environmental concern. Family ownership is measured using the proportion of shares owned by the family. Family members who serve on the board of directors are measured using the proportion of family members who are on the board of directors. Independent Commissioners are measured using the proportion of independent commissioners on the board of commissioners. Firm size is measured using the natural logarithm of total assets. Company age is measured using the length of the company since its establishment until the year of research. Data analysis in this study used multiple regression tests and Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) using the IBM SPSS ver. 22. The results show that family ownership has a significant positive effect on environmental strength and environmental concern in implementing CSR. The higher the family share ownership in the company, the higher the level of CSR implementation of the company, for this reason CSR implementation in family companies needs to be increased so that the company gets the legitimacy of the survival of the stakeholders. Variable of family members as independent directors and commissioners does not strengthen or weaken the effect of family ownership on CSR disclosure.
Keywords: Family firm, environmental strength and environmental concernTeks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Andreas, Hans Hananto, Usil S., Cucahyo dan Delima Elisabeth. 2015. Corporate Social Responsibility dan Profitabilitas. Journal Maranatha, vol 15 No 1.
Bassam, Qa’dan dan Mishiel Said Suwaidan. 2019. Board composition, ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: the case of Jordan. Social Responsibility Journal, ISSN: 1747-1117
Berrone, Pascual, Cristina Cruz, Luis R. Gomez-Mejia and Martin Larraza-Kintana. 2010. Socioemotional Wealth and Corporate Responses to Institutional Pressures: Do Family-Controlled Firms Pollute Less?. Administrative Science Quarterly 2010 55: 82
Branco, M. C., dan Rodriguez, L. L. 2008. Factors Influencing Social Responsibility Disclosure by Portuguese Companies. Journal of Business Ethics 83, 685–701
Cabeza-GarcÃaa, L., Sacristán-Navarro, M., & Gómez-Ansón, S. 2017. Family Involvement And Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 8, 109-122.
Carney, M. 2005. Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 249–265
Deephouse, D. L. & Jaskiewicz, P. 2013. Do family firms have better reputations than non-family firms? An integration of socioemotional wealth and social identity theories. Journal of Management Studies, 50 (3), doi: 10.1111/joms.12015
Dyer, W. G., & Whetten, D. A. 2006. Family Firms and Social Responsibility: Preliminary Evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(6), 785-802.
Ekonomi Bisnis. 2020. Pengelolaan Lingkungan, KLHK Soroti Sektor Manufaktur. (https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20200209/257/1199097/pengelolaan-lingkungan-klhk-soroti-sektor-manufaktur) Diakses pada Tanggal 17 Agustus 2020.
Eva López-González, Jennifer MartÃnez-Ferrero, Emma GarcÃa-Meca. 2019. Corporate social responsibility in family firms: A contingency approach. Journal of Cleaner Production: Volume 211, pages 1044-1064.
Fernando, Chitru S., Amal P. dan Abeysekera. 2018. Corporate social responsibility versus corporate shareholder responsibility: A family firm perspective. Journal of Corporate Finance
Fernando, Chitru S., Mark P. Sharfman, and Vahap B. Uysal. 2017. Corporate Environmental Policy and Shareholder Value: Following the Smart Money. Journal Of Financial And Quantitative Analysis
Friedman, Milton. 1970. The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. The New York Times Magazine
Ganiem, L. Mona, Eddy Kurnia. 2019. Komunikasi Korporat. Jakarta: Kencana
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. 2011. The binds that ties: Socioemotional preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 653–707
Hu, Y. Y., Zhu, Y., Tucker, J., & Hu, Y. 2018. Ownership influence and CSR disclosure in China. Accounting Research Journal, 31(1), 8-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-01-2017-0011
James J. Cordeiro, Ambra Galeazzo, Tara Shankar Shaw, Rajaram Veliyath M. K. Nandakumar. 2018. Ownership influences on corporate social responsibility in the Indian context. Asia Pac J Manag 35, 1107–1136
Jensen, M. C. “Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function.†Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 22 (2010), 32–42.
José Luis Esparza Aguilar. 2018. Corporate social responsibility practices developed by Mexicanfamily and non-family businesses. Journal of Family Business Management, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 40-53
Khan, A., Muttakin, M. B., & Siddiqui, J. 2013. Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures: Evidence from an Emerging Economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(2), 207–223.
Laura Madden, Amy McMillan, Oneil Harriss. 2020. Drivers of selectivity in family firms: Understanding the impact of age and ownership on CSR. Journal of Family Business Strategy
Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. 2016. Family Firms and Practices of Sustainability: A Contingency View. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(1), 26-33.
Longenecker, J. G., Moore, C. W., & Palich, L. E. 2006. Small Business Management: An Entrepreneurial Emphasis. (13rd ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson South-Wetern.
OJK, & IFC. 2014. The Indonesia Corporate Governance Manual (1 ed.). Jakarta.
OJK. 2018. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 9 /Pojk.04/2018 Tentang Pengambilalihan Perusahaan Terbuka
Price Waterhouse Cooper (PWC). 2018. Family Business Survey-Indonesia Report. (https://www.pwc.com/id/en/epc/fbs-2018-indonesia.pdf). Diakses pada Tanggal 13 Januari 2020.
Price Waterhouse Cooper (PWC). 2019. Press Release PWC Indonesia. (https://www.pwc.com/id/en/media-centre/press-release/2019/indonesian/bisnis-keluarga-harus-percaya-pada-pemimpin-generasi-penerus-unt.html) Diakses pada Tanggal 13 Januari 2020.
Rahmawati, Syarifah. 2017. Konflik Keagenan dan tata Kelola Perusahaan di Indonesia. Syiah Kuala University Press
Sahasranamam, Arya, Sud. 2019. Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility in an emerging market. Asia Pacific Journal of Management
Susanto, AB. 2005. World Class Family Bussiness (Membangun Family firm Berkelas Dunia). Jakarta: Quantum Bisnis dan Manajemen. PT. Mizan Pustaka
Tänzler, J.K., Keese, D., & Hauer, A. 2010. Differences among the Corporate Social Responsibility activities of companies with and without family influence – A first Comparison of German Vocational Education. Discussion Paper, 10th Annual Family Businesses Research Conference, IFERA Lancaster.
Tirole, J. 2001. Corporate Governance. Econometrica, 69, 1–35.
Wati, L., Nurlaela. 2019. Model Corporate Social Responsibility. Ponorofo: Myria Publisher
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30811/ekonis.v23i1.2185
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
Indexing by :![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
|---|---|
| ALAMAT KANTOR REDAKSI : Jurusan Tata Niaga Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe Jalan Banda Aceh - Medan Km 280,3 Buketrata Po Box 90, Telp (0645) 42785 Fax (42785) Phone : 085220281520 Email: [email protected] |








