Analysis of Hydro Test Pressure Variations on A106 Grade B Carbon Steel Pipe Welded Joints with Welding Repair Method

Riswan E.W. Susanto, Kris Witono, Agus Setiawan, Risno Bayu

Abstract


Transportation of oil and gas through oil refinery pipelines is faced with problems, including corrosion problems. Corrosion is a natural phenomenon that occurs in metal materials, where corrosion is a process of material damage due to chemical or electrochemical reactions with its environment. The purpose of this study is the results of the analysis of HydroTest pressure variations on the Welding Joints of Carbon Steel Pipes (carbon steel) A106 Gr.B. In the study did not discuss the occurrence of corrosion and other tests, while the welding process in detail was shown in WPS. This experimental research method uses the Welding Repair Method on welded joints according to the ASME IX, ASME B31.3 standard. The research material is A106 GR carbon steel pipe. B is in the form of a U Tube Seal Deck that has undergone corrosion and damage, where later the fabrication process (pipe repair) especially welding (using SMAW and GTAW) has been determined in PQR and WPS (WPS / CS / EM / ASME / WPxxx). The focus of this research is on stage 9 (hydro testing stage) of the Welding Repair method. Free variables in pressures of 240 Psi, 435 Psi, 690 Psi, and 910 Psi, which have been planned based on the thickness and length of the Pipe joint. Variable fixed temperature test Hydrotest 28OC, holding time holding time (pressurizing) 10 minutes and holding time peak 60 minutes before (depressurizing). The results were obtained that the pressure change was divided into two stages, pressurizing with the highest pressure of 915 Psi is the 4th pressure variation this was obtained from the test observation that there were no leaks in the welded joints and pipe materials in accordance with the acceptance criteria. While the second stage is (depressurizing) with a decrease in pressure or called realese, where successively realese 100%, 75%, 50%, 25%, and 0% at pressures of 915 Psi, 690 Psi, 435 Psi, 240 Psi, 0 Psi with the results of no leakage and observation test results in accordance with the acceptance criteria. So it can be concluded that the welded joints of carbon steel pipes tested using hydrotest, no deformation occurs, there is no change in shape and there are no leaks in the welded joint layer of A106 Gr.B carbon steel pipe


Keywords


Carbon Steel Pipe, Pressure, Hydrotest, Welding Repair

Full Text:

PDF

References


ASME BPVC. “Power Piping (ASME B31.1-2013) ASME B31.3-2012”. 2012. 2012

ASME BPVC. “Pressure Piping Code, including applicable addenda Andcodecases ASME B31.1-2013”. 2013

ASME.”ASME B31.3 Process Piping Standart”. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers. 2016

ASME BPVC. “Building Services Piping (ASME B31.9-2014)”. 2014

AWS D1.1. “Structural Standard” . 2015

Abdul Aziz dan Muchamad Oktaviandri. “Pengaruh Udara Yang Terkurung Di Chart Recorder Pada Proses Hydrotesting Test PT. Mulia Jaya Mandiri”, Jurnal Teknik Mesin: Vol. 09, No. 1, Februari 2020

CPDS 03-19-02 Rev 3. “Upstream Piping Fabrication, Erection, Inspection, Testing, and Cleaning Cepu Project Design Specification”CPDS 29-03-06 Rev 0. “Onshore Structural Welding and Inspection”.

CPDS 04-09-04 Rev 0. “Specification for Structural Steel Fabrication”.

Amri Moh. Syaiful, dkk. “Analisis Multiple Repair Pada Material Baja Karbon SA 333 Grade 6 dengan Proses GTAW Terhadap Kekerasan Ketangguhan, dan Struktur Mikro”. Jurnal INOVTEK POLBENG, Vol. 12, No. 1, Juni 2022

Pridyatam Parada Anugerah. “Analisa Rancangan Pipe Support Pada Sistem Perpipaan High Pressure Vent Berdasarkan Stress Analysis Dengan Pendekatan Caesar II Tegangan Pepipaan High Pressure Vent dengan pendekatan CAESAR II dan dengan batasan Allowable Stress dari ASME B31.3”. Jurnal Teknik POMITS Vol. 3, No. 2, 2014

SLAC, “Pressure Systems, Pressure Test Procedures. Hydrostatic Test”. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Environment, Safety & Health Division, Product ID: 613,| Revision ID: 2375, Date published: 26 October 2021, Date effective: 26 October 2021

Terasen Pipelines. “Main Line Hydrostatic Test Procedure, MP4121, Revision 2”. July 1999, Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc. Engineering Standars And Practice

Waspodo. “Analisa Head Loss Sistem Jaringan pipa pada sambungan pipa kombinasi diameter berbeda”. Universitas Muhammadiyah Pontianak. 2017




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30811/jowt.v4i2.3556

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

    

   

 

 Lisensi Creative Commons

Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.


Mailing Address:

Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe

Jl. Banda Aceh-Medan
Km. 280,3, Buketrata, Mesjid Punteut, Blang Mangat,
Kota Lhokseumawe, 24301

Propinsi Aceh,
Indonesia