Kebijakan Editorial

Fokus dan Ruang Lingkup

PORTAL: Jurnal Teknik Sipil (Journal of Civil Engineering) is a journal that communicates the results of research within the scope of civil engineering and scientific development as well as aspects of practitioners. The process of manuscript submission is open throughout the year. All submitted manuscript will be screened with double-blind peer review and editorial review before they are accepted to publish. Portal Journal receives a manuscript from the following area below civil engineering science and development with the interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary approach:

  • Building Materials and Structures
  • Constructions Technology
  • Constructions Economy and Management
  • Earthquake Engineering
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Renovation of Buildings
  • Geotechnical Engineering
  • Highway Engineering
  • Hydraulic and Hydraulic Structures
  • Road and Bridge Engineering
  • Structural Engineering
  • Surveying and Geo-Spatial Engineering
  • Transportation Engineering
  • Tunnel Engineering
  • Urban Engineering and Economy
  • Water Resources Engineering
  • Urban Drainage

 

Kebijakan Bagian

Artikel

Centang Naskah Terbuka Centang Diindeks Centang Telah di-Peer review

Editorial

Centang Naskah Terbuka Centang Diindeks Centang Telah di-Peer review
 

Proses Peer Review

Submitted papers are evaluated by anonymous referees by single blind peer review for contribution, originality, relevance, and presentation. The Editor Board shall inform you of the results of the review as soon as possible, hopefully in 1 month. Please notice that because of the great number of submissions that PORTAL: Jurnal Teknik Sipil (Journal of Civil Engineering) has received during the last few months the duration of the review process can be up to 2 months.

 

Kebijakan Akses Terbuka

This journal provides open access which in principle makes research available free to the public and will support the largest global knowledge exchange.

 

Pengarsipan

OJS sistem LOCKSS berfungsi sebagai sistem pengarsipan terdistribusi antar-perpustakaan yang menggunakan sistem ini dengan tujuan membuat arsip permanen (untuk preservasi dan restorasi). Lanjut...

 

Plagiarism Policy

By submitting your manuscript to the journal it is understood that this it is an original manuscript and is unpublished work and is not under consideration elsewhere. Plagiarism, including duplicate publication of the author’s own work, in whole or in part without proper citation is not tolerated by the journal.

In order to ensure the quality and avoid similarity of the content, please check the article by submitting in the following plagiarism checker.

 

Publication Frequency

This journal is published two times a year April and October

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Section A: Publication and authorship
• All submitted papers are subject to strict peer-review process by at least two international reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper. 
• Review process are blind peer review.
• The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language. 
• The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.
• If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
• Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.
• The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.
• No research can be included in more than one publication.

Section B: Authors’ responsibilities
• Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.
• Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
• Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
• Authors must participate in the peer review process.
• Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
• All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.
• Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.
• Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.
• Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.
• Authors must report any errors they discover in their published paper to the Editors.

Section C: Reviewers’ responsibilities
• Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information.
• Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author
• Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments
• Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
• Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
• Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Section D: Editors’ responsibilities
• Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
• Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.
• Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.
• Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
• Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.
• Editors should have a clear picture of a research’s funding sources.
• Editors should base their decisions solely one the papers’ importance, originality, clarity and relevance to publication’s scope.
• Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason.
• Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers.
• Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
• Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
• Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
• Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions, they should have proof of misconduct.
• Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers and board members.

 

Author Free of Charge

The authors are NOT reguired to pay an Article Submission Fee, Processing Fee, and Publication Fee.

 

References management

Every article accepted by PORTAL: Jurnal Teknik Sipil (Journal of Civil Engineering) use references management softwere. eg Mendeley or Zotero

 

Retraction

The papers published in the PORTAL: Jurnal Teknik Sipil (Journal of Civil Engineering) will be considered to retract in the publication if :

  1. They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabrication) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error)
  2. the findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper crossreferencing, permission or justification (i.e. cases of redundant publication)
  3. it constitutes plagiarism
  4. it reports unethical research

The mechanism of retraction follows the Retraction Guidelines of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which can be accessed at https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf.