Comparative finite element analysis of IIW linear stress extrapolation and haibach methods for structural hot-spot stress prediction in welded plate joints

Regan Rahadian Pambudi; Richard Alexander

doi:10.30811/jowt.v8i1.9504

Comparative finite element analysis of IIW linear stress extrapolation and haibach methods for structural hot-spot stress prediction in welded plate joints

Regan Rahadian Pambudi, Richard Alexander

Abstract

Accurate prediction of structural hot-spot stress (SHSS) is essential for evaluating welded joints. This study compares the International Institute of Welding (IIW) Linear Stress Extrapolation (LSE) and Haibach methods using finite element analysis performed with the open-source software CalculiX. Three weld geometry representations (no weld, chamfer, and fillet) and two mesh densities (fine and coarse) were investigated, resulting in six finite element models. Both SHSS methods were applied to evaluate stress prediction, mesh sensitivity, weld geometry effects, and computational performance. The IIW LSE method consistently predicted higher SHSS than the Haibach method, while mesh refinement produced variations below 4%. In contrast, weld geometry had a greater influence on SHSS prediction, with the chamfer model producing the highest stress. Fine meshes required approximately five to six times longer computational time than coarse meshes while providing only marginal improvements in SHSS prediction. Weld geometry representation was therefore found to have a greater influence on SHSS prediction than mesh density. The IIW LSE method is recommended for conservative structural assessment, whereas the Haibach method is suitable for preliminary engineering analyses requiring simpler post-processing.

Keywords

Structural hot-spot stress; welded joints; finite element analysis; IIW Linear Stress Extrapolation; Haibach method; weld geometry

References

T. G. Prasetia, M. Ariyon, Fitriani, A. Sebayang, and E. Tarigan, “Comparative Analysis of Compressive Strength of Steel Tubing Pipe Welding Results Using SMAW and MIG Welding with 140A Current,” International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 136–139, 2025, doi: 10.52088/ijesty.v5i1.644.

T. Lei, S. Gong, and C. Wu, “A Multi-Layer Multi-Pass Weld Bead Cross-Section Morphology Extraction Method Based on Row–Column Grayscale Segmentation,” Materials, vol. 17, no. 19, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.3390/ma17194683.

S. Marchetta, P. Corigliano, G. Palomba, G. Risitano, and D. Santonocito, “Validation of Notch-Stress Intensity Factor, Strain Energy Density and Effective Notch Stress approaches in fatigue life assessment of austenitic steel welded joints,” Fracture and Structural Integrity, vol. 20, no. 77, pp. 298–315, Jul. 2026, doi: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.77.18.

E. Van Puymbroeck, W. Nagy, K. Schotte, Z. Ul-Abdin, and H. De Backer, “Determination of residual welding stresses in a steel bridge component by finite element modeling of the incremental hole-drilling method,” Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 9, no. 3, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.3390/app9030536.

M. Kling, M. Winkler, S. Knefelkamp, A. Dürr, and K. Rother, “Experimental and numerical investigations on the mean stress effect on the fatigue of thin-walled tubular joints,” Welding in the World, May 2026, doi: 10.1007/s40194-025-02314-w.

A. F. Hobbacher and J. Baumgartner, “Recommendations for Fatigue Design of Welded Joints and Components,” 2024, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-57667-6.

Tim Gurney, “Cumulative Damage of Welded Joints,” Woodhead Publishing Series in Welding and Other Joining Technologies, pp. 418–433, 2006, Accessed: Jun. 27, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9781855739383500207

M. Nuruzzaman, “Finite element modeling of welded joint using effective notch stress approach,” 2016. Accessed: Jun. 27, 2026. [Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/1993/31598

N. Iqbal, H. Fang, A. Naseem, M. Kashif, and H. De Backer, “A numerical evaluation of structural hot-spot stress methods in rib-to-deck joint of orthotropic steel deck,” Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 10, no. 19, pp. 1–19, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.3390/app10196924.

H. Remes and W. Fricke, “Influencing factors on fatigue strength of welded thin plates based on structural stress assessment,” Welding in the World, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 915–923, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s40194-014-0170-7.

T. Mert, “Finite Element Analysis of Effect of Weld Toe Radius and Root Gap on Fatigue Life of T-Fillet Welded Joint,” Conference of the International Journal of Arts and Sciences, vol. 1, no. 20, pp. 119–127, 2009.

P. Corigliano and G. Palomba, “Fatigue Life Prediction Using Finite Element Hot-Spot and Notch Approaches: Strain-Based FAT Curves Proposal for Ti6Al4V Joints,” CMES - Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 1935–1955, 2025, doi: 10.32604/cmes.2025.067094.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30811/jowt.v8i1.9504