Critical Path Method (CPM) pada pengerjaan pipeline dan analisis resiko pada pengelasan
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
M. R. A. Simanjuntak and B. Christin, “ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR RISIKO CONTINGENCY COST PROYEK EPC PIPELINE,” Pros. SNITT POLTEKBA, vol. 4, pp. 429–437, 2020.
A. Mills, “A systematic approach to risk management for construction,” Struct. Surv., 2001.
J. James, “ANALISA PENILAIAN RESIKO PADA PROSES PENGELASAN DENGAN METODE JOB SAFETY ANALYSIS: STUDI KASUS: PT. MEINDO ELANG INDAH,” IDENTIFIKASI J. Ilm. Keselamatan, Kesehat. Kerja dan Lindungan Lingkung., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 18–29, 2017.
J. L. F. Freire, R. D. Vieira, P. M. Fontes, A. C. Benjamin, L. S. Murillo C, and A. C. Miranda, “The critical path method for assessment of pipelines with metal loss defects,” in International Pipeline Conference, 2012, vol. 45134, pp. 661–671.
Y. B. Suryono and H. Hasbullah, “ANALYSIS OF NEW PRODUCTION LINE PROJECT IMPROVEMENT THROUGH CRITICAL PATH METHOD (CPM), DESIGN STRUCTURE MATRIX (DSM) AND PROGRAM EVALUATION AND REVIEW (PERT),” J. Ind. Eng. Manag. Res., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 9–17, 2020.
S. J. Mantel, J. R. Meredith, S. M. Shafer, and M. M. Sutton, Project management in practice 4. United States: John Wiley & Sons. Inc, 2011.
D. Jin, “Construction Project Schedule Risk Analysis and Assessment Using Monte Carlo Simulation Method,” 2008.
A. Frederika, “Analisis percepatan pelaksanaan dengan menambah jam kerja optimum pada proyek konstruksi,” J. Ilm. Tek. Sipil, vol. 14, no. 2, 2010.
D. N. Versitas, “DNV-RP-G101,” 2010.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30811/jowt.v3i1.2068
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
Mailing Address:
Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe
Jl. Banda Aceh-Medan
Km. 280,3, Buketrata, Mesjid Punteut, Blang Mangat,
Kota Lhokseumawe, 24301
Propinsi Aceh,
Indonesia